Therabody TheraFace Mask vs Omnilux Contour Face
Last reviewed August 2026.
Both hold a matched FDA clearance and both have been metered under the same cited protocol, so this is a comparison on numbers. The Omnilux Contour Face delivers more light at the skin per the cited test; dose per session and price do the rest of the deciding.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you — commission never changes a ranking or a verdict (how this site is funded).
| Therabody TheraFace Mask | Omnilux Contour Face | |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Brand-held K — Cleared — the brand holds its own K-number | OEM-held K — Cleared — rides an OEM or licensor's K-number |
| K-number · holder · decided | K230293 · Therabody, Inc. · 2023 | K191629 · Ismart Marketing Svcs, Ltd. · 2019 |
| Measured irradiance | 19.4 mW/cm² (cited spectrometer test) | 26.7 mW/cm² (cited spectrometer test) |
| Dose per session | 7 J/cm² — 7 J/cm² over the 6-minute red + red/NIR portion of the 9-minute cycle (blue excluded) | 16 J/cm² — 16 J/cm² over the fixed 10-minute session |
| Wavelengths | 633 + 830 nm (+ 415 nm blue) | 633 + 830 nm |
| LED count (marketing, not ranked) | “648 LED lights for full-face coverage” — the biggest count in the table, third by dose | “132 medical-grade LEDs” (66 dual-chip bulbs) |
| Session | 9 min | 10 min |
| Price | $649.99 (therabody.com product page, 2026-09-04) Amazon ↗ | $395.00 (omniluxled.com product page, 2026-09-04) Amazon ↗ |
Therabody TheraFace Mask: Therabody filed K230293 in its own name in June 2023, naming the TheraFace Mask exactly; the listing carries both wrinkle and acne codes, and earlier TheraFace attachments (K212155, K212238) show the company has been filing its own paper since 2021. Nothing in the record distinguishes its clearance from a $349 competitor's — a 510(k) is a safety-and-equivalence review, not a performance ranking, which is worth remembering at $649.99. The vibration/massage features sit outside the light-therapy record entirely.
Omnilux Contour Face: The clearance is real — and it is not Omnilux's. FDA's registration & listing database shows “Omnilux Contour” listed under K191629, a 510(k) granted in September 2019 to Ismart Marketing Svcs, Ltd. of Birmingham, UK, for a device named faceLITE. The same I-SMART listing carries eighteen other brand names — PRIORI, faceLITE, Smoothskin DuoLux, Glo mask, Deesse Pro Express, City Beauty's mask and more — and CurrentBody's parent, The Beauty Tech Group, lists “Omnilux contour” under the same K-number. Riding a licensor's clearance is legal and common; the record simply says the paper behind the best-known mask in the category names a different device and a different company.
How to choose
Same protocol, so the irradiance and dose columns are comparable. A higher irradiance means a shorter session for the same dose; a bigger dose per session means more light per sitting. Neither column says anything about results — a 510(k) is a safety and equivalence review, not a results guarantee. If the numbers are close, buy on price and on who holds the clearance.
The single-mask pages go deeper: Is the Therabody TheraFace Mask FDA cleared? · Is the Omnilux Contour Face FDA cleared? · or see the ranking by measured irradiance and the full clearance record.
LED Mask Score indexes manufacturers' FDA marketing claims against the FDA's own public record — the 510(k) database and the registration & listing index — with links, so you can read the paper yourself. We test nothing and give no medical or skincare advice. A 510(k) clearance is a safety-and-equivalence review, not a performance ranking, an endorsement, or an "FDA approval." If a brand publishes a K-number or listing that changes a row, the page changes — the record wins.
Some product links on this page are affiliate links: as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Affiliate status never changes a ranking or a verdict — full affiliate disclosure.