LED Mask Score

Shark CryoGlow vs Omnilux Contour Face

Last reviewed August 2026.

Both hold a matched FDA clearance, but only one has a measurement under the cited protocol. The Omnilux Contour Face has a metered irradiance and dose; the Shark CryoGlow does not, and numbers from other testers at other distances do not share a ruler — so this page compares the clearance record, the published specs and the price, and says plainly where the measurement is missing.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you — commission never changes a ranking or a verdict (how this site is funded).

 Shark CryoGlowOmnilux Contour Face
VerdictBrand-held K — Cleared — the brand holds its own K-numberOEM-held K — Cleared — rides an OEM or licensor's K-number
K-number · holder · decidedK242796 · SharkNinja Operating, LLC · 2024K191629 · Ismart Marketing Svcs, Ltd. · 2019
Measured irradianceNot metered under the cited protocol — Brand-held K242796 (wrinkles + acne). Other testers have metered it under different protocols at different distances — numbers from different protocols don't sh26.7 mW/cm² (cited spectrometer test)
Dose per session16 J/cm² — 16 J/cm² over the fixed 10-minute session
Wavelengths630 nm red · 830 nm infrared · blue (nm as published on page)633 + 830 nm
LED count (marketing, not ranked)“132 medical-grade LEDs” (66 dual-chip bulbs)
Session10 min
Price$349.99 (sharkninja.com product page, 2026-09-04) Amazon ↗$395.00 (omniluxled.com product page, 2026-09-04) Amazon ↗

Shark CryoGlow: SharkNinja filed K242796 in its own name in November 2024, covering the CryoGlow family (FW3XXXX), and its FDA listing carries both the wrinkle (OHS) and acne (OLP) product codes — the claim on the box and the paper behind it have the same name on them. Contract manufacturers in Vietnam and China appear in the listing index without their own K-numbers, which is the normal shape of a brand-held clearance. MAUDE adverse-event reports exist for this device, as they do for other masks in the table — reports are indexed, not judged, in our eye-safety guide.

Omnilux Contour Face: The clearance is real — and it is not Omnilux's. FDA's registration & listing database shows “Omnilux Contour” listed under K191629, a 510(k) granted in September 2019 to Ismart Marketing Svcs, Ltd. of Birmingham, UK, for a device named faceLITE. The same I-SMART listing carries eighteen other brand names — PRIORI, faceLITE, Smoothskin DuoLux, Glo mask, Deesse Pro Express, City Beauty's mask and more — and CurrentBody's parent, The Beauty Tech Group, lists “Omnilux contour” under the same K-number. Riding a licensor's clearance is legal and common; the record simply says the paper behind the best-known mask in the category names a different device and a different company.

How to choose

Where one side has no measurement under the cited protocol, do not fill the gap with the brand's own figure or a different tester's — they are not on the same ruler. Compare what is comparable: the clearance and who holds it, the wavelengths, the session, and the price. A missing measurement is not a mark against the mask; it is a reason to say “unknown” rather than “less”.

The single-mask pages go deeper: Is the Shark CryoGlow FDA cleared? · Is the Omnilux Contour Face FDA cleared? · or see the ranking by measured irradiance and the full clearance record.

LED Mask Score indexes manufacturers' FDA marketing claims against the FDA's own public record — the 510(k) database and the registration & listing index — with links, so you can read the paper yourself. We test nothing and give no medical or skincare advice. A 510(k) clearance is a safety-and-equivalence review, not a performance ranking, an endorsement, or an "FDA approval." If a brand publishes a K-number or listing that changes a row, the page changes — the record wins.

Some product links on this page are affiliate links: as an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you. Affiliate status never changes a ranking or a verdict — full affiliate disclosure.